<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Derive the Instrumentation Amplifier Transfer Function</title>
	<atom:link href="http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/</link>
	<description>Electronics Design and Modeling with Emphasis on Analog Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  I was looking at the same thing.  This clarifies. Great article by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  I was looking at the same thing.  This clarifies. Great article by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian S. Nastase</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-4452</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian S. Nastase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-4452</guid>
		<description>The notations are just a convention.  Your U3 being turned upside down, is the same as saying &quot;let&#039;s call the upper transistors R3 and R4 and the lower transistors R1 and R2, and let&#039;s switch V11 and V12 labels between them&quot;.  The resistor ratio is the same, since R4/R3 = R2/R1.  Because we switched V11 and V12, then, yes, Vout1 = R2/R1 (V12-V11).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notations are just a convention.  Your U3 being turned upside down, is the same as saying &#8220;let&#8217;s call the upper transistors R3 and R4 and the lower transistors R1 and R2, and let&#8217;s switch V11 and V12 labels between them&#8221;.  The resistor ratio is the same, since R4/R3 = R2/R1.  Because we switched V11 and V12, then, yes, Vout1 = R2/R1 (V12-V11).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-4443</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-4443</guid>
		<description>Hi, if U3 is up side down, means R4 connects to ground and R2 connects to Vout and U3 has the opposite sign. Will all the equation be not changed?
for example, will the equation 2 become Vout1=R2/R1(V12-V11)?
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, if U3 is up side down, means R4 connects to ground and R2 connects to Vout and U3 has the opposite sign. Will all the equation be not changed?<br />
for example, will the equation 2 become Vout1=R2/R1(V12-V11)?<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian S. Nastase</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-3820</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian S. Nastase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-3820</guid>
		<description>Yes, it will be zero.  But nothing is a perfect zero in this Universe.  You will still have a few millivolts at the amplifier output due to offset, or due to V1 and V2 not being perfectly equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it will be zero.  But nothing is a perfect zero in this Universe.  You will still have a few millivolts at the amplifier output due to offset, or due to V1 and V2 not being perfectly equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>Hi,
If input voltages V1 and V2 are the same, does it mean that output voltage equals zero volt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
If input voltages V1 and V2 are the same, does it mean that output voltage equals zero volt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian S. Nastase</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-3044</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian S. Nastase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 05:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-3044</guid>
		<description>Grant, the two equations are identical, if R1 = R3 and R2 = R4 as stated two paragraphs above.  

Equation (2) in this article is Vout1 = R2/R1 *(V11-V12).
Equation (1) in &lt;a href=&quot;http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/the-differential-amplifier-transfer-function/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to Derive the Differential Amplifier Transfer Function&lt;/a&gt; is Vout = V1 * R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R4/R3) - V2 * R4/R3.

If R1 = R3 and R2 = R4 then
R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R4/R3) = R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R2/R1) = R2/R1, and
R4/R3 = R2/R1

The inputs of the differential amplifier, which is the instrumentation amplifier output stage, are V11 instead of V1 and V12 instead of V2.  We also note Vout with Vout1. Therefore, from the differential amplifier transfer function, as applied to the instrumentation amplifier output stage we get

Vout1 = V11 * R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R4/R3) - V12 * R4/R3 = V11 * R2/R1 - V12 * R2/R1 = R2/R1 * (V11 - V12),

exactly as shown in equation (2).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant, the two equations are identical, if R1 = R3 and R2 = R4 as stated two paragraphs above.  </p>
<p>Equation (2) in this article is Vout1 = R2/R1 *(V11-V12).<br />
Equation (1) in <a href="http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/the-differential-amplifier-transfer-function/" rel="nofollow">How to Derive the Differential Amplifier Transfer Function</a> is Vout = V1 * R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R4/R3) &#8211; V2 * R4/R3.</p>
<p>If R1 = R3 and R2 = R4 then<br />
R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R4/R3) = R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R2/R1) = R2/R1, and<br />
R4/R3 = R2/R1</p>
<p>The inputs of the differential amplifier, which is the instrumentation amplifier output stage, are V11 instead of V1 and V12 instead of V2.  We also note Vout with Vout1. Therefore, from the differential amplifier transfer function, as applied to the instrumentation amplifier output stage we get</p>
<p>Vout1 = V11 * R2/(R1+R2) * (1+R4/R3) &#8211; V12 * R4/R3 = V11 * R2/R1 &#8211; V12 * R2/R1 = R2/R1 * (V11 &#8211; V12),</p>
<p>exactly as shown in equation (2).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>I looked at the derivation for the transfer function of the differential amplifier, as linked, but the transfer function proven on that page looks nothing like equation 2. How did you derive equation 2 of this page from the differential amplifier&#039;s transfer function?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at the derivation for the transfer function of the differential amplifier, as linked, but the transfer function proven on that page looks nothing like equation 2. How did you derive equation 2 of this page from the differential amplifier&#8217;s transfer function?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian S. Nastase</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian S. Nastase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>Arun, here are the calculations:

First, factorize V1*(1+R5/RG), 
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*(V1*(1+R5/RG)*(1+R6/(R5+RG)))

Then, introduce 1 in each fraction,
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*(V1*(RG+R5)/RG*(R5+RG+R6)/(R5+RG))

Simplify RG+R5
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*V1*(R5+RG+R6)/RG

And, because R5=R6,
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*V1*(RG+2R5)/RG

Distribute RG, and this is the final result:
Vout1 = V1*(R2/R1)*(1+2R5/RG)

Let me know if you need anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arun, here are the calculations:</p>
<p>First, factorize V1*(1+R5/RG),<br />
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*(V1*(1+R5/RG)*(1+R6/(R5+RG)))</p>
<p>Then, introduce 1 in each fraction,<br />
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*(V1*(RG+R5)/RG*(R5+RG+R6)/(R5+RG))</p>
<p>Simplify RG+R5<br />
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*V1*(R5+RG+R6)/RG</p>
<p>And, because R5=R6,<br />
Vout1 = (R2/R1)*V1*(RG+2R5)/RG</p>
<p>Distribute RG, and this is the final result:<br />
Vout1 = V1*(R2/R1)*(1+2R5/RG)</p>
<p>Let me know if you need anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arun</title>
		<link>http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/how-to-derive-the-instrumentation-amplifier-transfer-function/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=621#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>you did not solve equation number 6.how did u obtain equation 7 after solving equation 6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you did not solve equation number 6.how did u obtain equation 7 after solving equation 6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

