<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Apply Thevenin&#8217;s Theorem to Solve a Negative Resistance Circuit, or Current Source	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/</link>
	<description>Electronics Design and Modeling with Emphasis on Analog Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wayne		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 06:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1773#comment-3536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I must have stared at EQ. 2 for 15 minutes trying to understand why it was (Vo-Vin)/(R2+R1) rather than (Vo-Vth)/R2.  I calculated Vth to be the same when using Superposition which was my default method of choice.  It&#039;s all clear now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have stared at EQ. 2 for 15 minutes trying to understand why it was (Vo-Vin)/(R2+R1) rather than (Vo-Vth)/R2.  I calculated Vth to be the same when using Superposition which was my default method of choice.  It&#8217;s all clear now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3474</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1773#comment-3474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3460&quot;&gt;Cathy Kowalski&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you, Cathy, for the idea.  I will consider it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3460">Cathy Kowalski</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you, Cathy, for the idea.  I will consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cathy Kowalski		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cathy Kowalski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1773#comment-3460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[great explanation.  Would you ever consider publishing an Amazon Kindle Edition of any of your books?

A person can have up to 3500 books on a Kindle and it only weighs 8 ounces.

Sincerely, Cathy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great explanation.  Would you ever consider publishing an Amazon Kindle Edition of any of your books?</p>
<p>A person can have up to 3500 books on a Kindle and it only weighs 8 ounces.</p>
<p>Sincerely, Cathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3313</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1773#comment-3313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3312&quot;&gt;Amp&lt;/a&gt;.

VTH comes from the loop equation for VTH, R1 and Vin.  Since there is no current in the Op Amp terminals, the voltage drop on R1 is the current through R2 times R1.

&quot;The ckt will reduce to Vin with R1 in series and Vo with R2 in series.&quot;
Correct.  In the first stage of the calculation, when we eliminate RL, R1 and R2 have the same current, and that is I2. This is shown in equation 2:  I2 = (Vo-Vin)/(R1+R2).

&quot;No current goes into opamp terminals&quot;
Correct.

&quot;so we don’t need a model for the opamp&quot;
That is correct.  I used the model to show that the Op Amp can be considered a voltage-controlled-voltage-source, for ease in understanding and calculation.  But, yes, one can apply Thevenin&#039;s Theorem without the model, just by leaving the Op Amp in place. 

Another reason for using the model is to show, with another example, how to apply Thevenin&#039;s Theorem for solving circuits with dependent sources. 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3312">Amp</a>.</p>
<p>VTH comes from the loop equation for VTH, R1 and Vin.  Since there is no current in the Op Amp terminals, the voltage drop on R1 is the current through R2 times R1.</p>
<p>&#8220;The ckt will reduce to Vin with R1 in series and Vo with R2 in series.&#8221;<br />
Correct.  In the first stage of the calculation, when we eliminate RL, R1 and R2 have the same current, and that is I2. This is shown in equation 2:  I2 = (Vo-Vin)/(R1+R2).</p>
<p>&#8220;No current goes into opamp terminals&#8221;<br />
Correct.</p>
<p>&#8220;so we don’t need a model for the opamp&#8221;<br />
That is correct.  I used the model to show that the Op Amp can be considered a voltage-controlled-voltage-source, for ease in understanding and calculation.  But, yes, one can apply Thevenin&#8217;s Theorem without the model, just by leaving the Op Amp in place. </p>
<p>Another reason for using the model is to show, with another example, how to apply Thevenin&#8217;s Theorem for solving circuits with dependent sources. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amp		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/apply-thevenins-theorem-to-solve-a-negative-resistance-circuit/#comment-3312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1773#comment-3312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How do you get equation 1. Please elaborate.
No current goes into opamp terminals, so we don&#039;t need a model for the opamp. correct?
The ckt will reduce to Vin with R1 in series and Vo with R2 in series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you get equation 1. Please elaborate.<br />
No current goes into opamp terminals, so we don&#8217;t need a model for the opamp. correct?<br />
The ckt will reduce to Vin with R1 in series and Vo with R2 in series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
