<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Apply Thevenin&#8217;s Theorem – Part 1, Solving Circuits with Independent Sources	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/</link>
	<description>Electronics Design and Modeling with Emphasis on Analog Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:48:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 19:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=651#comment-42047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42005&quot;&gt;Astorino&lt;/a&gt;.

I see why you would want a different notation for I1. However, I would not change I1 as I change the figure. Although they are different currents, they refer to the same resistor R1. The circuit changes, as the figures show, so the current through R1 changes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42005">Astorino</a>.</p>
<p>I see why you would want a different notation for I1. However, I would not change I1 as I change the figure. Although they are different currents, they refer to the same resistor R1. The circuit changes, as the figures show, so the current through R1 changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42046</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 19:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=651#comment-42046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42004&quot;&gt;Astorino&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for your comments.
1. I do not see that typo. Maybe you have an old version of this article?
2. As you say in your second post, you found the answer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42004">Astorino</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments.<br />
1. I do not see that typo. Maybe you have an old version of this article?<br />
2. As you say in your second post, you found the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Astorino		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astorino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=651#comment-42005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Again, I guess I found the answer in your part 2 article

I1 first time is when R2 is out of circuit.. The second I1 is the original I1 of first circuit when the R2 is put back in the circuit.

This is not so clear in the text. Why not to call them I1&#039; and I1 and I2&#039; and I2 etc..

Thank you again

Antonio]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Again, I guess I found the answer in your part 2 article</p>
<p>I1 first time is when R2 is out of circuit.. The second I1 is the original I1 of first circuit when the R2 is put back in the circuit.</p>
<p>This is not so clear in the text. Why not to call them I1&#8242; and I1 and I2&#8242; and I2 etc..</p>
<p>Thank you again</p>
<p>Antonio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Astorino		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-42004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Astorino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=651#comment-42004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First thank you very much...for your contribution and details. I like it.

Few remarks:

1-There is an error-typo when you write &quot;there are two way to find R1&quot; which should read &quot;there are two ways to find I1&quot;

2-Why do you find two different values for each I1, I2, I3 and I4 ? First time you say &quot;After calculation we find... I1 = &quot;0.176 mA&quot;... and later &quot;I1=-0.112 mA&quot; ? Did I get you wrong ?

Brgds
Antonio]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thank you very much&#8230;for your contribution and details. I like it.</p>
<p>Few remarks:</p>
<p>1-There is an error-typo when you write &#8220;there are two way to find R1&#8221; which should read &#8220;there are two ways to find I1&#8221;</p>
<p>2-Why do you find two different values for each I1, I2, I3 and I4 ? First time you say &#8220;After calculation we find&#8230; I1 = &#8220;0.176 mA&#8221;&#8230; and later &#8220;I1=-0.112 mA&#8221; ? Did I get you wrong ?</p>
<p>Brgds<br />
Antonio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-207</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=651#comment-207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Part 2 of this series will explain the method.  Please RSS this website to be notified when this article will be published.
==============
&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt;: Part 2 is published here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-2-nested-thevenin-sources-method/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How to Apply Thevenin’s Theorem – Part 2, Nested Thevenin Sources Method&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 2 of this series will explain the method.  Please RSS this website to be notified when this article will be published.<br />
==============<br />
<strong>Update</strong>: Part 2 is published here:<br />
<a href="http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-2-nested-thevenin-sources-method/" rel="nofollow">How to Apply Thevenin’s Theorem – Part 2, Nested Thevenin Sources Method</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: samskeen		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-apply-thevenins-theorem-part-1/#comment-206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[samskeen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=651#comment-206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What are nested Thevenin sources? You mention this as a second method. Can you please explain?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are nested Thevenin sources? You mention this as a second method. Can you please explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
