<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Mastering Electronics Design	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com</link>
	<description>Electronics Design and Modeling with Emphasis on Analog Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on An ADC and DAC Least Significant Bit (LSB) by Boss Manno		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/an-adc-and-dac-least-significant-bit-lsb/#comment-65763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boss Manno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1331#comment-65763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very helpful article on LSB&#039;s in a A/D converter. Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpful article on LSB&#8217;s in a A/D converter. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Derive the RMS Value of a Sine Wave with a DC Offset by Bob Lacovara		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-a-sine-wave-with-a-dc-offset/#comment-63712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Lacovara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1963#comment-63712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is a (rare) pleasure to find an article that answers a question that had come up with an analysis that is clear and correct. Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a (rare) pleasure to find an article that answers a question that had come up with an analysis that is clear and correct. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Derive the RMS Value of a Sine Wave with a DC Offset by power		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-a-sine-wave-with-a-dc-offset/#comment-61330</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[power]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 03:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://MasteringElectronicsDesign.com/?p=1963#comment-61330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-a-sine-wave-with-a-dc-offset/#comment-9861&quot;&gt;dox&lt;/a&gt;.

much simpler. all anybody needs to understand is that when you take say RMS, you are taking the Mean of the Square, so that means the Square is what is important, and you have to work in Squares. the Root is just to convert back to the units you started with after your work in Squares is done. obviously the Squares here are because Watt=VV/Ohm so were by working in Squares were treating power as the most important quantity and doing our voltage calcuations so that they give the right power calculations, power being proportional to the Square of the voltage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-a-sine-wave-with-a-dc-offset/#comment-9861">dox</a>.</p>
<p>much simpler. all anybody needs to understand is that when you take say RMS, you are taking the Mean of the Square, so that means the Square is what is important, and you have to work in Squares. the Root is just to convert back to the units you started with after your work in Squares is done. obviously the Squares here are because Watt=VV/Ohm so were by working in Squares were treating power as the most important quantity and doing our voltage calcuations so that they give the right power calculations, power being proportional to the Square of the voltage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Build an Op Amp SPICE Model from Its Datasheet &#8211; Part 1 by Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/buildi-an-op-amp-spice-model-from-its-datasheet/#comment-74152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 22:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1599#comment-74152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/buildi-an-op-amp-spice-model-from-its-datasheet/#comment-55578&quot;&gt;Cath&lt;/a&gt;.

It is very simple. For +VCC, just add a DC voltage Between the ground and the diode cathode at the output. The DC voltage has the symbol like a battery with the positive terminal to the diode and the negative terminal to ground. For -VCC, do the same, but with the inverted battery.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/buildi-an-op-amp-spice-model-from-its-datasheet/#comment-55578">Cath</a>.</p>
<p>It is very simple. For +VCC, just add a DC voltage Between the ground and the diode cathode at the output. The DC voltage has the symbol like a battery with the positive terminal to the diode and the negative terminal to ground. For -VCC, do the same, but with the inverted battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Build an Op Amp SPICE Model from Its Datasheet &#8211; Part 1 by Cath		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/buildi-an-op-amp-spice-model-from-its-datasheet/#comment-55578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 06:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1599#comment-55578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/buildi-an-op-amp-spice-model-from-its-datasheet/#comment-35407&quot;&gt;Adrian S. Nastase&lt;/a&gt;.

can you please give a clear image of how that will be added in the opamp modelling and also how it will affect if not added?
Also will be perfect if you add a schematic to show the connection]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/buildi-an-op-amp-spice-model-from-its-datasheet/#comment-35407">Adrian S. Nastase</a>.</p>
<p>can you please give a clear image of how that will be added in the opamp modelling and also how it will affect if not added?<br />
Also will be perfect if you add a schematic to show the connection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Derive the RMS Value of Pulse and Square Waveforms by Shiva		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-pulse-and-square-waveforms/#comment-55089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 04:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1489#comment-55089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-pulse-and-square-waveforms/#comment-16661&quot;&gt;Adrian S. Nastase&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes it is valid for any function]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-pulse-and-square-waveforms/#comment-16661">Adrian S. Nastase</a>.</p>
<p>Yes it is valid for any function</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Differential Amplifier Calculator by Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-60304</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 20:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1287#comment-60304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-53105&quot;&gt;Al Testani&lt;/a&gt;.

Let&#039;s look at it this way. If Vin = 0V, R1 is connected to ground, in parallel with R2. There is no current going through them. So, in effect, the non-inverting input of the op amp is connected to ground and the &lt;strong&gt;circuit becomes an inverting amplifier&lt;/strong&gt;. With V2 being a positive value of +2.5V, how can the op amp output be positive when it inverts? 
When V1 = 0V, the output is V2 = -R4/R3 * 2.5V= - (4kohm / 10kohm) * 2.5V = -1V exactly as the calculator shows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-53105">Al Testani</a>.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at it this way. If Vin = 0V, R1 is connected to ground, in parallel with R2. There is no current going through them. So, in effect, the non-inverting input of the op amp is connected to ground and the <strong>circuit becomes an inverting amplifier</strong>. With V2 being a positive value of +2.5V, how can the op amp output be positive when it inverts?<br />
When V1 = 0V, the output is V2 = -R4/R3 * 2.5V= &#8211; (4kohm / 10kohm) * 2.5V = -1V exactly as the calculator shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Differential Amplifier Calculator by Dave		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-53907</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 10:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1287#comment-53907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-52383&quot;&gt;Graham Toal&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Graham. If you are still grappling with this problem reply here. I have the solution... and it&#039;s not a differential amp.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-52383">Graham Toal</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Graham. If you are still grappling with this problem reply here. I have the solution&#8230; and it&#8217;s not a differential amp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Differential Amplifier Calculator by Al Testani		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-53105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Testani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 03:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1287#comment-53105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-51060&quot;&gt;Adrian S. Nastase&lt;/a&gt;.

I am seeing the same contradiction to the following link as Mihai Beffa
https://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/Op-Amp/Op-Amp-Voltage-Calculator.phtml
I get the same results to that link in a simulator.  

With your default values, an input of +2.5V the above link and simulator gives Vo = +1V but with an input of 0V, Vo = +2V not the -1V as your calculator requires.

What is the problem?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/differential-amplifier-calculator-2/#comment-51060">Adrian S. Nastase</a>.</p>
<p>I am seeing the same contradiction to the following link as Mihai Beffa<br />
<a href="https://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/Op-Amp/Op-Amp-Voltage-Calculator.phtml" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/Op-Amp/Op-Amp-Voltage-Calculator.phtml</a><br />
I get the same results to that link in a simulator.  </p>
<p>With your default values, an input of +2.5V the above link and simulator gives Vo = +1V but with an input of 0V, Vo = +2V not the -1V as your calculator requires.</p>
<p>What is the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to Derive the RMS Value of Pulse and Square Waveforms by Adrian S. Nastase		</title>
		<link>https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-pulse-and-square-waveforms/#comment-53015</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian S. Nastase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/?p=1489#comment-53015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-pulse-and-square-waveforms/#comment-52524&quot;&gt;Koojase&lt;/a&gt;.

I am not sure what you are trying to say. The RMS value does not depend on time values, within reason. If you have a signal which is on for 3 days and then off for 3 days, then you can consider it as a DC signal depending on the corresponding processes in your system. 

For example: You try to determine what connector you can choose, based on the RMS value of the current that has to go through one pin. If you have a PWM signal of say, 100 kHz, then yes, you can use the RMS value. But if you have a signal with a period of 10 seconds, then you have to look at the maximum value of the current over 10 seconds. That spec becomes now DC, not AC.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://masteringelectronicsdesign.com/how-to-derive-the-rms-value-of-pulse-and-square-waveforms/#comment-52524">Koojase</a>.</p>
<p>I am not sure what you are trying to say. The RMS value does not depend on time values, within reason. If you have a signal which is on for 3 days and then off for 3 days, then you can consider it as a DC signal depending on the corresponding processes in your system. </p>
<p>For example: You try to determine what connector you can choose, based on the RMS value of the current that has to go through one pin. If you have a PWM signal of say, 100 kHz, then yes, you can use the RMS value. But if you have a signal with a period of 10 seconds, then you have to look at the maximum value of the current over 10 seconds. That spec becomes now DC, not AC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
